Water Quality Program - Water Policy & Economics

In agriculture, environmental regulations have usually been voluntary. New regulations, however, such as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants, and more stringent stormwater permits, often seek mandatory pollution control from agriculture and other non-point sources. Economic analysis of water quality regulation focuses on either cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness studies seek to determine how to meet clean water goals by concentrating on least cost sources of pollution reduction. In particular, there is some evidence that further reduction in water pollution is cheaper to obtain from non-point sources such as agriculture than from already heavily regulated point sources. Cost-benefit studies attempt to measure whether the value of water quality benefits exceeds the costs of implementing pollution-reduction measures. Benefits can be direct, such as fewer water-related illnesses, or indirect such as improved habitat for fish and wildlife. Economists place a dollar value on these benefits by estimating consumers' willingness to pay (WTP). Often, economists lack location-specific information necessary to properly value the benefits of improved water quality.

Some resources for more information include the Resources for the Future (RFF) website general water page, and their page for Valuation of Environmental Benefits.

Cost and Return Studies of crops from alfalfa to watermelon are available from the UC Davis Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ARE), and are searchable by crop or county/region.

Other resouces that may be of interest include articles from the UC Davis ARE Update newsletter, such as:

[top]


Water Quality Program

  Water Issues Survey

  Watershed Management

  Nutrients & Pesticide Mgmt.

  Drinking Water & Human Health

  Water Cons. & Ag Water Mgmt.

  Water Policy & Econ.

  Animal Manure & Waste Mgmt.

  Nitrate Hazard Index