Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:41:56 -0800 (PST) Reply-to:
email@example.com From: "Jan Derks"
<firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Multiple recipients of list
<email@example.com> Subject: Re: Interesting
Ditto, ditto!! From someone who's had egg on my face more than once due to
purchasing "new" sets that we already had under a different individual or series
title, I'm fed up, too! Another "challenge" I've faced several times this year
is purchasing a title that I don't realize is part of a set. Of course, I only
realize this when the title arrives and the jacket indicates that the title's
part of a series. We only put out complete sets of any series, knowing that, if
we don't, patrons will immediately want the title in the series that we don't
have. Ideas on how to deal with that?
A/V Collections Librarian
Arapahoe Library District
Littleton, CO 80121
Gary Handman wrote:
> Hi all.
> This recent discussion has gotten me to thinking: we're 400 or 500 strong
> on this list, not a bad chunk of buying power. Seems to me that as a sort
> of pressure group, we might be able to lean on vendors whose practices
> are...um...questionable, or odd. I don't think Insight would care a fig
> about what we say...I think FFHS would.
> Should we be doing something en masse?
> At 08:35 AM 12/01/1999 -0800, you wrote:
> >I agree. My other pet peeve, and this applies primarily to
> >FFHS, is not including the date. You wouldn't believe how many
> >duplicates were ordered this past year because of this trick of
> >putting old titles into "sets" and renaming the set.
> >Also, it appears that a number of titles this past two years are
> >not the exclusive right of one distributor to sell and so
> >several distributors will handle the same work and alter the
> >description and/or title and call that item "new" in their
> >Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:24:45 -0800 (PST)
> >Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org From: "Beth
> >Hansen" <email@example.com> To: Multiple recipients of
> >list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Interesting
> > You have stumbled on one of my pet peeves! I dread the appearance of
> >faculty requests from their catalogs! I always feel morally obligated to
> >research all the alternative pricing options on their titles before finally
> >placing an order with Insight! They also have a tricky way of supplying
> >titles which do not accurately reflect the item.... thus I have ended up
> >with duplicates on occasion despite my best sleuthing efforts!
> > Arrrrrrgh!
> > Beth Hansen
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: email@example.com
> >> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Gary Handman
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 1:58 PM
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list
> >> Subject: Interesting pricing
> >> Thumbing thru the latest Insight Media catalog, I noticed two interesting
> >> things:
> >> Woman in the Dunes is listed at $149 (it sells for $29.95 at FACETS)
> >> Marat/Sade is listed at $99 (it sells for $24.95 at FACETS)
> >> Somehow, I don't think shipping and handling account for the differences.
> >> Any Insight lurkers out there want to address this?
> >> Gary Handman
> >> Director
> >> Media Resources Center
> >> Moffitt Library
> >> UC Berkeley, CA 94720-6000
> >> 510-643-8566
> >> email@example.com
> >> "You are looking into the mind of home video. It is innocent, it
> >> is aimless,
> >> it is determined, it is real" --Don DeLillo, Underworld
> Gary Handman
> Media Resources Center
> Moffitt Library
> UC Berkeley 94720-6000
> "Everything wants to become television" (James Ulmer -- Teletheory)