RE: question from filmmaker/distributor

M. Dew (mdew@post.cis.smu.edu)
Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:39:48 -0800 (PST)

i second that emotion!
that's one of the problems I have with the
Films for Humanities catalogs...
-Margaret Dew
SMU-Center for Media & IT
Dallas, TX
<mdew@mail.smu.edu>

> Also, ensure that you have the date of production of the videos in
> your catalog, we find it extremely frustrating that many distributors
> neglect this essential info. Many times this is a determining factor for
> considering an item for preview.
>
> Robert Hooft
> Justice Institute of B.C
> Library - A/V Section
> 715 McBride Blvd
> New Westminster, B.C.
> V3L 5T4
> Visit our website at: www.jibc.bc.ca
>
>
>
>
> > From: Stan_Gilliam/Guilford@guilford.edu
> > [SMTP:Stan_Gilliam/Guilford@guilford.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 6:56 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject: Re: question from filmmaker/distributor
> >
> > When sending materials to faculty, I think that it would be best to send
> > out smaller fliers with targeted subject areas
> rather than a big catalog with everything in it.
> > However, if you have to send out an omnibus catalog, it should be clearly
> > indexed by subject areas.
> > I think the most important part is to saves them time. They are more
> > likely to peruse your titles if they can to
> > get to the relevant ones quickly.
> >
> > I guess the model for this is Films for the Humanities.
> >
> > Another advantage to this approach is that I can distribute the relevant
> > fliers to people I know would be interested.
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
>
>