Gary Handman (
Wed, 13 May 1998 12:27:31 -0700 (PDT)

OK patience (never one of my strong suits to begin with) has
officially worn out. Although I am loath to invoke my autocratic
privilege as list owner, I feel I must at this point.

The videonews and videolib lists are lists established to build a
community of film and video librarians, producers, and distributors.
So far, these lists have (in my estimation) been tremendously productive
and on the mark. Although discussion and debate can be a vital part of
these lists, the recent correspondence (from the Planet Mungo, apparently)
concerning SGLs (whatever the hell those are) are too far off the mark to
tolerate any longer.

I encourage anyone who wants to continue this particular conversation to
take it outside. And since democracy has its limits, I'll zap anyone from
the list who continues to bother us all with this counterproductive
blather...let's get on with business.


Gary Handman
Media Resources Center
Moffitt Library
UC Berkeley, CA 94720-6000

"You are looking into the mind of home video. It is innocent, it is aimless,
it is determined, it is real" --Don DeLillo, Underworld

On Tue, 12 May 1998, NewMoonSon wrote:

> In a message dated 5/11/98 11:35:30 PM, wrote:
> <<As I said to chango73, one of the principal subjects in HORSE
> Latino, thus the forward to a poc list. The purpose of this e-mail is not to
> incite sarcastic or exclusionist comments. It was to let people know about a
> wonderful documentary about an openly gay mixed race couple living a dignified
> and admirable life in rural America--a story not often told, and one that
> needs to be part of our collective history.
> It's difficult to tell where people are coming from with these comments
> (below), but IF someone is out there saying that african-americans or anyone
> else does or doesn't belong somewhere, that person needs to check her/hiself.
> >>
> I believe the question, asked by chango, was...
> <, as a SGL african-american male, what could I learn from this
> movie?>
> And it is a valid one. Simply because one of the people in the relationship is
> a man of color does *not* mean that it is necessarily a story about/for POC. I
> am reminded of the many interracial pathological fiction tales told by Black
> gay men in late 80s/early 90s that might have been *about* Black gay men but
> weren't actually *about* and *for* us.