Would like your thoughts on this one

Susan Albrecht (albrechs@wabash.edu)
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:11:59 -0400

--=====================_8740765==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Hey, everyone.

I'd love to know what you all think of this. A well-respected (by
me, too!) company from whom I've purchased many times in the past has
always had a distinction between college/corporate use and public
library/high school use in its pricing. This I know is their
perogative, because it's simple price tiering with no kind of claim
made about usage needs.

However. Now there is a "home video" option at, not surprisingly, a
lower price yet. Here's the warning one gets when one puts such an
item in one's cart:

* HOME VIDEO - program comes with a warning against classroom use
periodically during the program - more information
The "more information" link provides this:

Home video purchasers may use the videos in non-institutional
contexts only. At two points during home video videocassettes script
will appear over the image stating that this videocassette has been
purchased for home use only and may not be used in class, circulated
in an institutional library or be exhibited to the general public.

Now, I just don't think this can be done. Once a "home use" option
has been offered up, it's fair game for libraries whose collections
are used only for 1) individual checkout or 2) classroom use. WE
DON'T NEED PPR in our case, because this will be used in only those
two ways I've just mentioned, and we are COVERED by the face-to-face
teaching exemption. Or is the insertion of this script in the video
supposed to act as a "contract" between seller & buyer?

Am I wrong to feel justified in purchasing the "Home Video" option?

Susan at Wabash College

Susan Albrecht
Acquisitions Coordinator
Wabash College Lilly Library
Crawfordsville, IN
x6216
albrechs@wabash.edu

*********************************************************************************
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."--Neil Peart
*********************************************************************************

--=====================_8740765==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

Hey, everyone.

I'd love to know what you all think of this.  A well-respected (by me, too!) company from whom I've purchased many times in the past has always had a distinction between college/corporate use and public library/high school use in its pricing.  This I know is their perogative, because it's simple price tiering with no kind of claim made about usage needs.

However.  Now there is a "home video" option at, not surprisingly, a lower price yet.  Here's the warning one gets when one puts such an item in one's cart:

The "more information" link provides this:

Home video purchasers may use the videos in non-institutional contexts only. At two points during home video videocassettes script will appear over the image stating that this videocassette has been purchased for home use only and may not be used in class, circulated in an institutional library or be exhibited to the general public.


Now, I just don't think this can be done.  Once a "home use" option has been offered up, it's fair game for libraries whose collections are used only for 1) individual checkout or 2) classroom use.  WE DON'T NEED PPR in our case, because this will be used in only those two ways I've just mentioned, and we are COVERED by the face-to-face teaching exemption.  Or is the insertion of this script in the video supposed to act as a "contract" between seller & buyer?

Am I wrong to feel justified in purchasing the "Home Video" option?

Susan at Wabash College


Susan Albrecht
Acquisitions Coordinator
Wabash College Lilly Library
Crawfordsville, IN
x6216
albrechs@wabash.edu

*********************************************************************************
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."--Neil Peart
*********************************************************************************

--=====================_8740765==.ALT--