Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Videolib] Fair use of videos]]
Meghann R Matwichuk (mtwchk@UDel.Edu)
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:41:49 -0500 (EST)
>> I agree with Gary--if you want to establish two-tiered pricing, be up front
>> about it. While I have a philosophical problem with two-tiered pricing
>> because of what it implies about how we use materials, I also understand
>> that some folks need the additional $$ for future productions.
> I'm not quite so understanding. Why unfairly charge us for what might be
> done? It is not so different from what book publishers tried to do to
> libraries early on. First they tried to close them down, and also tried a
> different pricing scheme. But today they don't try to charge more for books
> sold to libraries because someone might scan it and place it on the web.
It's been my understanding that the rationale for two-tiered pricing
structures is not necessarily the use of the item, but the assumed budgets
of the institutions... i.e. that a college/university will be more able
to pay the triple digit price tag than a school media center or public
library. Not that I agree -- we all know how wildly budgets vary across
those borders -- but this is the impression that I've gotten from talking
to vendors, etc.
Meghann R. Matwichuk
Instructional Media Department
University of Delaware
181 S. College Ave.
Newark, DE 19717
Videolib mailing list