(no subject)

videolib-bounces@library.berkeley.edu
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:47:59 -0800 (PST)

b=c6ZDkdgujKfPSWqYQAsSvrsGeKKzk1v3FxP2CjoGxvwSKHFzr5i72K4byOjcr0EIhk17DXAq+ZnKw/XAB9DTU0v9U/es9qxrTmvyf8QmcEorMSFb28/WAAgN6BJe34+eLAi04KzQNXRJWDvjunYTQXxxk8hIDreUzFU8mbV4eZQ=
;
Message-ID: <20050119014751.36069.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [67.105.110.211] by web50301.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:47:51 PST
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:47:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Cecilia Hurt <fuzzee_rabbit@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [Videolib] Film Censorship, Part 2
To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: <CBC4CA3B637B3445B7E4B7928ACA50BE017A4FAD@admsmxs2usr10.ad.jocoks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: videolib@library.berkeley.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu
Sender: videolib-bounces@library.berkeley.edu
Errors-To: videolib-bounces@library.berkeley.edu

The fact that the film was no longer available for
checkout was the part that I was referring to in my
subject line. (Although I did find the main part of
the article unsettling also.)

I received many responses in my personal e-mail about
this, but not everyone read the entire article. So, to
clarify. . . my use of the word censorship was
referring to the library's decision to remove the film
from the circulating collection.

I will be more careful in my subject line selection
and more specific about what I am referring to in the
future.

--- "Cartford, Peter, JCL" <CartfordP@jocolibrary.org>
wrote:

> A guideline is not censorship. The city is
> perfectly within its rights
> to exercise some discretion over what kinds of films
> will be shown, in
> public, at its libraries. What is disturbing is
> that last sentence:
> "The film is no longer available for checkout."
>
>
>
> Peter Cartford
> AV Librarian
> Johnson County Library
> Overland Park, KS
> 913-495-2496
> cartfordp@jocolibrary.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: videolib-bounces@library.berkeley.edu
> [mailto:videolib-bounces@library.berkeley.edu] On
> Behalf Of Cecilia Hurt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:51 PM
> To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu
> Subject: [Videolib] Film Censorship
>
>
>
> Hello, everyone!
>
>
>
> Please see below a current film censorship story. At
> this time, I do not
> know of any actions being taken to reinstate the
> film in the collection.
>
>
>
> On a related note, for this year's Banned Books
> Week, the Video Round
> Table will be creating an attractive
> banned/challenged/censored film
> handout. It will be made available on the VRT web
> site. We are in the
> information gathering stage of development. Does
> anyone have suggestions
> for titles that should included?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> ~Cecilia
>
>
>
> Official cancels viewing of film
>
> By Jean Weaver
>
> Special to the Star-Telegram
>
> ARLINGTON - Interim City Manager Fred Greene
> canceled the showing of a
> movie with sexual overtones Thursday that the
> Arlington Public Library
> had planned to show at its independent film festival
> this month.
>
> Falling Angels, based on a novel by a Canadian
> writer, contains female
> nudity, sex scenes, adultery, adult language and
> situations, incest
> overtones and unwanted pregnancy set in the 1960s.
>
> The library had been planning to launch an
> independent film festival at
> the George W. Hawkes Central Library, 101 E. Abram
> St., with three
> movies scheduled from Jan. 29 through March. The
> other two films, Buddy
> and Witnesses, are being reviewed.
>
> "The film has been pulled," Arlington Mayor Pro Tem
> Ron Wright said.
> "The librarians were given strict content guidelines
> by Greene, which
> are based upon the information that if a film cannot
> be shown to someone
> under 17, then it would not be appropriate for the
> city libraries of
> Arlington."
>
> The Canadian film was released in U.S. theaters Oct.
> 31. It was not
> rated by the Motion Picture Association of America.
> However, a
> recommendation on the back cover of the video says
> it should not to be
> shown to people under 17.
>
> Adults-only films have never been shown at the
> Arlington libraries, said
> Starr Krottinger, public services administrator for
> the Arlington Public
> Library System. Reference librarian Linda Seitz said
> that she has
> previewed half of Falling Angels and is aware of the
> content.
>
> The films were aimed at college-age people, she
> said.
>
> Library patron Carlos Medina, 23, of Arlington said
> the library wasn't
> the place for the film. "There are plenty of other
> places to see that
> kind of stuff," Medina said. "They don't have to
> show it at the
> library."
>
> The film is no longer available for checkout.
>
>
>
>

=====
"Nowhere can you be that you are not meant to be."


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_______________________________________________
Videolib mailing list
Videolib@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/videolib