Mike Tribby
Senior Cataloger
Quality Books Inc.
The Best of America's Independent Presses
mailto:mike.tribby@quality-books.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Rosner [mailto:jrosner@kino.com]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:50 AM
To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] More on Chan Films
My mistake I did not read the attachment first, I know found NAATA's
response more annoying. In their initial attack they did went after the Chan
CHARACTOR not the white Actor portrayal, so I think they are just trying to
look better Charlie Chan is a MIDDLE AGED man so he just as desexed as Nero
Wolf and other such detectives, hardly news to fans of this genre. ( best
line in one discussion group on this mentioned that obese Montenegrins would
want Nero Wolf off the air for offensive stereotypes). They are grasping at
anything to justify censorship. They go on to refer to the 46 Chan films and
the offensive black stereotypes in many of those, FINE BUT THOSE WERE NOT
THE ONES FOX OWNS OR WAS BROADCASTING , another Red Herring. I especially
liked the part were they claimed they were not trying to "censor" films and
said that like violence & Sex there should somehow be "limits" on racial
stereotypes. This is a silly comparison and cable stations routinely run
plenty of sex & violence not seen on commercial networks. I don't want the
racial stereotype police deciding what is and is NOT offensive. Huge numbers
of films especially from the silent era through the forties contain racial
stereotypes of Blacks, Jews, Italians, Irish etc Who is supposed to decide
what gets aired and in what "context"
Also I still find it the height of hypocrisy ( Sorry Dennis) that NAATA
supports and ENCOURAGES screenings of films starring Anna May Wong & Sessue
Hayakawa many of which contain INCREDIBLY negative stereotypes of Asians but
tells us that we dare not watch Chan films without their guidance & sell
appointed context.
This is EXACTLY what gives the right ammunition to attack "liberal" media
and academia. Either you believe in free speech and access or you don't No
one should put limits on my ability to watch these films , though obviously
Fox can because they own them and caved into to NAATA ( frankly I do believe
Mrs. Murdoch theory as I don't see Rupert suddenly becoming PC)
Jessica
-- Jessica Rosner Kino International 333 W 39th St. 503 NY NY 10018 jrosner@kino.com> From: Gary Handman <ghandman@library.berkeley.edu> > Reply-To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu > Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:15:18 -0700 > To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Videolib] More on Chan Films > > > Hello all! > > Just back from vacation, I found a note in my inbox from Eddie Wong of > NAATA. Attached is a response from NAATA re the Chan films. More > interestingly, Eddie tells me that NAATA is currently negotiating with > Fox for possibly showing the Chan films with historical context. > > stay tuned! > > > > Gary Handman > Director > Media Resources Center > Moffitt Library > UC Berkeley > ghandman@library.berkeley.edu > http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC > > "In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all of > life presents itself as an immense accumulation of spectacles." > --Guy Debord > _______________________________________________ > Videolib mailing list > Videolib@library.berkeley.edu > http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/videolib >
_______________________________________________ Videolib mailing list Videolib@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/videolib _______________________________________________ Videolib mailing list Videolib@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/videolib