RE: [Videolib] NAATA & Fox

Elizabeth Stanley (
Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:48:00 -0400

The petition is a good idea, Gary.

But first, has anyone from Video Round Table talked with the leadership of
NAATA to find out the facts?

Check out their forum with letters to and from Fox on the issue:

NAATA Distribution
145 Ninth Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415-552-9550


> ----------
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:10:37 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [Videolib] Censorship from NAATA & Fox Movie Station
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
I have a proposal... There are over 600 people who subscribe to this
list--librarians, teachers, filmmakers, distributors. Those of us who
feel that Fox's actions are an irresponsible (and plain stupid) could sign
a petition that could be submitted to Fox. Even if only half of us signed,
it's hard to believe Fox would just blow the whole thing off.

I personally am not willing to see political correctness wreak havoc with
the annals of visual culture in this country.

At 10:08 AM 7/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Of course the ALA has an Office of Intellectual Freedom. But the Fox
>Channel is a private organization that can do as it pleases. Censorship
>is specifically defined as a banning of information by a public or
>government agency (like a school or a state government office). On a
>somewhat different but related note: There is a book titled Censorship
>2001: 25 Years of Censored News (Available on amazon). The book tells
>the stories that never make to your news broadcasts. Take a look at -
>get it from your local library. You will be shocked!
>News channels make decisions (right or wrong) all the time about what
>they will and will not show their viewers. And isn't that why there was
>such a hue and cry over the latest FCC decision about ownership of the
>media? This is much bigger than Charlie Chan. Charlie Chan is the tip of
>this proverbial iceberg.
>Linda Fox - Director VOICE: (518) 786-3221
>School Library System FAX: (518) 786-6401
>Capital Region BOCES E-MAIL:
>6G British American Blvd. URL:
>Latham, NY 12110 Member - NYLA Legislative Committee
> >>> 07/02/03 09:34AM >>>
>I agree. Mr. Chan is a hero of mine. So what can we do about it?
>the ALA have a group involved in censorship issues?
>Jed Horovitz
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
>[]On Behalf Of Mary M.
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:59 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] Censorship from NAATA & Fox Movie Station
> Bravo, Jessica. This would be terrible censorship, if indeed it
> Has the NAATA watched these movies before deciding to "ban them"?
>doesn't sound like it.
> Mary Kirby
> Library Media Project
> At 06:56 PM 7/1/03 -0400, you wrote:
> I am sure I am opening up a BIG can of worms here but I am VERY
> and sad that due a complaint from NAATA and other Asian American
> organizations the Fox Movie Channel has abruptly cancelled
>showings of
> the classic Charlie Chan films from the thirties. I think it is
> and tragic that ANY media organization would encourage censorship
>to the
> extent of preventing films from being seen. What is particularly
> upsetting is that I doubt most of these people have ever WATCHED
> films. While the issue of white actors playing Asian roles can be
> debated , do we ban ALL films in which white actors play Indians,
> Asians , Non- Jews playing Jews etc ? In fact the Chan character IS
> the shuffling pigeon English speaking buffoon described in NAATA's
>letter of
> complaint , but a well educated , well spoken HERO who always
>solves the
> mystery the white police CAN'T . I realize it is not
> my place to tell someone what is and is not a stereotype of their
> I would love to know exactly WHICH films people watched to come to
> conclusion. The Charlie Chan films are much prized by film &
> and are wonderful "B" movies that helped launch the careers of
> directors, writers & actors
> To get these films "banned" by removing them from TV ( You can't
> legally on video) is the worst kind of censorship. Should Kino
> BROKEN BLOSSOMS or THE CHEAT since they contain respectively a
> playing a Chinese character and a stereotype of a lustful Asian. I
> plan on campaigning against the many of the films by starring Anna
> & Sessue Hayakawa which often contain stereotypes for worse than
> Chan even if the actors were Asian
> It is just inexcusable to encourage Fox or anyone to remove
> a film that you find offensive. If they wanted Fox to do some
> commentary or have links to a web site explaining their position
> have been an excellent way of getting their view across. This is
> pure & simple
> There is one amusing bit of irony in that the highest rated show
> on the Fox News Channel is Bill O'Reilly who spends a LOT of time
> attacking the "left" for their "PC" attitudes on cultural issues
> I suggest he look in his own backyard.
> Jessica Rosner
> Kino International
> 333 W 39th St. 503
> NY NY 10018
> _______________________________________________
> Videolib mailing list
>Videolib mailing list

Gary Handman
Media Resources Center
Moffitt Library
UC Berkeley

"What is cinema? Nothing. What does cinema want? Everything. What can
cinema do? Something."
--Jean-Luc Godard, Histoire(s) du cinema

Videolib mailing list
Videolib mailing list