I seem to remember the "Elizabeth R" at one point in the advertising myself
(although this could be senility). Either way, this reminds me of an
important question I was going to ask you: would you like to review "The
Audiovisual Cataloging Current" edited by Sandra K. Roe from Haworth Press?
Would need review by Oct. 1. Let me know?
8705 Honeycomb Ct. NW
Seabeck, WA 98380
Tel: (800) 692-2270; Fax: (360) 830-9346
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Tribby" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: History Channel video title
> Hey Randy!
> I just sent the message below to the OLAC list, then I saw the title in
> question reviewed in the new VL and thought you might be interested, too.
> swear when this thing first came out A&E's promotional flurry referred to
> as Elizabeth R--a fact obviously lost on the money changers at New Video!
> Bryce Canyon
> >Several years ago I attended one of the A-V Cataloging workshops that
> >Olsen gives in the summer. I asked her this
> >very question. Her answer was to view the ones that require original
> >cataloging, but do not automatically view the ones that already have
> >cataloging copy available on OCLC.
> A problem with this approach was illustrated for me today. I was
> the History Channel/A&E/New Video release about Queen Elizabeth I in both
> its DVD and VHS incarnations. I was able to view existing OCLC records
> these items (being a filthy vendor, we can only view utility bib. records)
> and in both cases the title in the 245 $a was Elizabeth (there were no
> 246s). Upon viewing the actual programs I noticed more letters in the
> calligraphic curlie-cues accompanying the title, so I called our contact
> New Video and she checked with their marketing director. It turns out
> the title screen presentation is a reproduction of Queen Elizabeth's
> signature, which reads: "Elizabeth R." No "R" appears on the disc
> the VHS labels or any of the packaging. A patron who saw the original
> presentation on television might be interested in finding the title
> Elizabeth R, but without at least viewing the title sequence, you'd never
> know that was this video's title. It seems to me that one really should
> least view title screens and not trust any source implicitly. Not even
> Mike Tribby