Re: Licensing Question

Jessica Rosner (jrosner@kino.com)
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT)

I think in house is OK. Basically it is the Disney stuff that they are
worried about as they are psychos on this and this can NOT be listed in
papers or off premise.
-- 
Jessica Rosner
Kino International
333 W 39th St. 503
NY NY 10018
jrosner@kino.com

> From: "Mike Boedicker" <mboedicker@hotmail.com> > Reply-To: videolib@library.berkeley.edu > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:48:12 -0700 (PDT) > To: Multiple recipients of list <videolib@library.berkeley.edu> > Subject: Licensing Question > > We're considering an umbrella license from Motion Picture Licensing > Corporation to show movies in the library. However, their literature states > that the license does not cover showings "where specific titles have been > advertised or publicized." > > Is in-house publicity allowed, at least? Or is this rule truly as limiting > as it sounds? What's the point of paying for an umbrella license when you > can't promote the films? Anyone out there have experience with MPLC and > this problem? > > <br><br><br>Mike Boedicker > Audiovisual Director & Webmaster > Danville Public Library > 319 N. Vermilion, Danville, IL 61832 > (217) 477-5223 ext. 123 / Fax: (217) 477-5230 > mboedicker@hotmail.com > http://www.danville.lib.il.us > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >