RE: future DVD?

Ralph Huntzinger (
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:09:52 -0700 (PDT)

Great stream -- interesting branches. Hopefully there will be more
discussion at Media Market and that will be reported here (in all its
glory, not just the sanitized version.)
However, let's not forget what part of the "business" most of us claim
to be (or have been) in: librarianship of some sort. A concern for
content is part of our professional duties just like stewardship of public
funds and providing requested materials for our "public(s)". 90% of what
we supply may be "trash", hopefully it is balanced by the 10% that may be
"treasure" -- my old daddy used to say that "one man's trash is another
man's treasure is another man's ...

I'll fade into the background and concentrate on creating illusions and
wonder -- but, don't forget the basics.

Ralph Huntzinger
King County Library System
155 days left but who's counting

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Darryl Wiggers wrote:

> At one point Gary Handman says (in part) "The lessons here are: Content has
> nothing to do with anything anymore." Forgive me, but I think this is
> important so I'll repeat it again: "Content has nothing to do with anything
> anymore."
> I highlight this not because I'm thrilled to hear it (though I derive a
> sense of "So what? More DVDs for Christmas. Yipee!" from the writer) but
> because, thus far, I think it's the most succinct and accurate statement in
> this thread. I see it everyday. Already I'm meeting 20-something folks who
> refuse to watch anything unless it's on DVD. The lack of picture sharpness
> on VHS now repulses them much like how my generation reacted to black &
> white movies 20 or so years ago. Even if a movie title interests them, they
> would rather wait to see if it comes out on DVD. If not, they'll simply opt
> for what is available. Preferably a newer title because older films weren't
> made with Stereo Dolby Digital 5.1. Ultimately "content has nothing to do
> with anything anymore."
> A number of list members have already predicted that many titles will be
> forever lost because they don't make the DVD transition (is there any
> doubt?). But I also think it's obvious few will care because "content has
> nothing to do with anything anymore."
> In the last few months I've been checking out some of the latest DVD titles,
> and the "goodies" everyone seems to love. I find it interesting that most of
> these "goodies" (an interesting, positive term) are actually marketing
> elements, such as the Terminator 3-D ride on the T2 DVD, or the LL Cool J CD
> on Any Given Sunday. Even standard features like chapter selection and
> language selection are listed as "extras" or "Special Features" -- I assume
> because most people are incapable of realizing the deception. Again,
> "content has nothing to do with anything anymore."
> So I turn my attention back to broadcasting where, even in the days of VHS,
> a far wider selection of films are made available. And now, with digital
> signals, the quality of the picture is even better. But, gradually, more and
> more commercials creep in. And corporate logos are burned onto the bottom
> right-hand corner. And content is cut because it is deemed offensive, or
> they need more room for commercials. And, ultimately, few will care anyway
> because "content has nothing to do with anything anymore."
> And someday it'll be reported on the TV news: "Hooray! It's official!
> Culture is Dead -- Marketing Rules!" And most of us will stare blankly at
> our TV screens because "content has nothing to do with anything anymore."
> dw