> From: Jim Scholtz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Reply-To: email@example.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
> To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: Copyright
> Say Becky, You are correct for now about the copyrighted work (for U.S.
> works being author's life plus 28 years renewable for an additional 28
> years. However, the law will be (or already has changed) to author's life
> plus 90 years for films. I know that you've received other e-mails on this
> topic from better informed sources than myself. As was said previously,
> this new law effects older films previously in the public domain like "It's
> a Wonderful Life" - boy if this law would have been in effect in the 80's
> Ted Turner wouldn't have made all that money colorizing B/W old films and
> destroying the masters, then applying for a new copyright. Darn it... Jim
> At 08:22 AM 9/26/00 -0700, you wrote:
>> Ignore my previous post for information re copyright. I found the
>> information and it is 28 years from the date of copyright on anything prior
>> to 1/1/78 unless renewed.
>> Sorry for the increase in traffic.
>> Becky Carolus
>> Administrative Assistant
>> MediaTech & UCIF
>> 203 Special Services Bldg.
>> 863-3101 / 863-2574 (fax)
> <img src="0" width=10 height=10 alt="Emacs!"></html>