And this week the Coen Brothers are re-releasing Blood Simple which actually
trims a lot of scenes to quicken the pace. Back in 1984 the pace was fine.
So which is the "creative artist's" view? Good luck finding the original in
a few years time. I'd recommend snatching up all existing videos before they
disappear forever.
Then you have films like Friedkin's Rampage. When he originally made it,
Friedkin had a very definite view about capital punishment. Then Dino De
Laurentis' company, DEG, went under (the company financing the film) and it
was shelved. Five years later the film was finally available for release,
but Friedkin had changed his views. So, off to the editing room he went, and
produced a new version. NOTE: The IMDB states that only the ending was
changed. Not true. The opening is different, and many of Deborah Van
Valkenburgh's scenes were taken out. Once again, good luck finding the
original.
Filmmakers are always changing their minds and even studio-influenced
changes are seen as beneficial. Terry Gilliam, who fought a huge fight with
Universal over the editing of Brazil, admitted that the studio head
recommendations to insert cloud footage in the opening and ending were
great. Good luck finding any version that opens and closes as Gilliam
originally intended.
dw
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Huntzinger [mailto:ralphunt@kcls.org]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 2:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Feature Films for Families
Ah, for the director's cut instead of what the studios
wanted; wide-screen instead of pan-and-scan; made for ???? instead of
made-for-TV; the good-old-original instead of the remake; anything instead
of Disney; --- I always errored on the side of being sure the "creative
artist's" view was represented and then offered whatever else was
available (access meant having many views available, "censorship" meant
having some views unavailable) IMHO
Ralph Huntzinger